So you have to crop or retake your shot before printing. Which leads onto the QX10 – it’s darn heavy so you really have to Think about it before taking it out and about, and it’s not 2016 nobody shoots in square format any more. Sticking w Zink, HP has also released the Sprocket 3×4, which prints 3″x4″ zink shots (ie twice as big as all the zink printers in the article). It way deserves to be on any “best of” list. Print quality (colour and contrast) is better than the Sprocket. The HP Sprocket Select prints 30% bigger shots than the regular Sprocket or any of the listed 3×2 zink printers from other brands, in a sleeker body, and the paper cost is about the same. ![]() Certain content was provided "as is" from Amazon daily and is subject to change or removal at any time. Other good options and my runners-up are the HP Sprocket (best in terms of design) and the Canon SELPHY CP1300 (best in terms of cost per print).Īs an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. But if you want the best print quality possible, sacrificing slightly in size and cost per photo, then the clear winner is the Canon SELPHY Square QX10. We have to say, if you are looking for a small portable printer to carry anywhere, the practical choice is the Polaroid Zip, as it performed well in every category. Canon SELPHY Square QX10 ($0.75 per print)Īnd the Best Portable Photo Printer Winner Is…. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |